Jamendo sues Suno, claiming its Bark model trained on 919 hours of Jamendo music
Winamp Group’s music licensing subsidiary Jamendo sued Suno in Massachusetts federal court on June 29, 2026. The complaint says Suno trained on the MTG-Jamendo research dataset without a license, including roughly 919 hours of Jamendo audio inside Bark, Suno’s early open-source audio model. It is Jamendo’s second AI training lawsuit in a week.
What Jamendo’s complaint against Suno claims
The complaint brings 4 sets of claims: copyright infringement under the US Copyright Act, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and unfair and deceptive business practices under Massachusetts law. Jamendo says Suno “blatantly disregarded” its intellectual property rights and seeks an injunction plus actual damages and Suno’s profits.
The filing leans on Suno’s own words. It quotes the company’s public stance about “extreme speed” and its embrace of the line “impatience is a virtue” as evidence the infringement was willful. The US Copyright Office issued a registration for the dataset on June 17, 2026, less than 2 weeks before the suit, as Music Business Worldwide reported.
The MTG-Jamendo dataset keeps generating lawsuits
The MTG-Jamendo dataset is a research collection of more than 55,000 tracks Jamendo built around 2019 with the Music Technology Group at Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona. It was released for non-commercial research only. Commercial use requires a paid license from Jamendo.
A week before this filing, Jamendo sued Nvidia over the same dataset, alleging its Fugatto and Audio Flamingo models trained on it. The Suno case adds a twist the Nvidia case lacks: a paper trail. Jamendo invoiced Suno for the unauthorized use on September 29, 2025. Suno confirmed receipt by October 3 and did not pay. Jamendo’s Belgian counsel sent a formal notice of default on October 14.
Where the Jamendo case lands in Suno’s copyright docket
The suit joins a crowded calendar. Universal and Sony are litigating against Suno in the same federal district and want to expand their case to 61,026 recordings, a move covered in the RIAA v. Suno tracker. Germany’s GEMA is pressing a separate composition-focused case, and Denmark’s Koda filed its own suit in June.
Warner Music took the other exit and settled in November 2025 with a licensing deal. Every new plaintiff makes the unresolved question louder: what does AI training on unlicensed music cost? Jamendo, unusually, already named its price. It sent an invoice.
Frequently asked questions
What does Jamendo's lawsuit against Suno claim?
Filed June 29, 2026 in Massachusetts federal court, the complaint brings claims for copyright infringement under the US Copyright Act, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and unfair and deceptive business practices under Massachusetts law. Jamendo seeks an injunction plus actual damages and Suno's profits.
How is Suno's Bark model involved in the Jamendo lawsuit?
Bark is an early open-source audio model Suno released before its music platform took off. Jamendo's complaint alleges Bark was built in part on roughly 919 hours of Jamendo audio taken from the MTG-Jamendo dataset, which was released for non-commercial research only.
Did Jamendo bill Suno before filing the lawsuit?
Yes. Jamendo says it invoiced Suno for the unauthorized use on September 29, 2025, and Suno confirmed receipt by October 3 but did not pay. Jamendo's Belgian counsel then sent a formal notice of default on October 14, 2025, months before the June 2026 filing.
How is Jamendo's Suno lawsuit different from its Nvidia lawsuit?
Both cases center on the MTG-Jamendo dataset, but the Nvidia complaint targets the Fugatto and Audio Flamingo models in California, while the Suno case runs in Massachusetts and adds breach of contract and unfair business practice claims on top of copyright infringement.

